Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Comparison with other plane segmentation approaches on the SegComp ABW dataset

From: Depth image-based plane detection

Approach Regions in Ground truth Correctly detected CDR (%) Over-segmented Under-segmented Missed (not detected) Noise (not detected)
SegComp ABW data set (30 test images) by Hoover et al. [32]
USF[35] 15.2 12.7 83.5 0.2 0.1 2.1 1.2
WSU[35] 15.2 9.7 63.8 0.5 0.2 4.5 2.2
UB[35] 15.2 12.8 84.2 0.5 0.1 1.7 2.1
UE[35] 15.2 13.4 88.1 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.8
OU[35] 15.2 9.8 64.4 0.2 0.4 4.4 3.2
PPU [35] 15.2 6.8 44.7 0.1 2.1 3.4 2.0
UA[35] 15.2 4.9 32.2 0.3 2.2 3.6 3.2
UFPR[35] 15.2 13.0 85.5 0.5 0.1 1.6 1.4
Trevor et al. [37] 15.2 9.7 63.8 0.8 0.4 3.9 2.8
Georgiev et al. [36] 15.2 6.9 45.4 0.6 1.9 3.6 2.1
Holz et al. [38] 15.2 8.4 55.1 1.2 0.5 4.2 2.3
Oehler et al. [34] 15.2 11.1 73.0 0.2 0.7 2.2 0.8
Ours 15.2 11.3 74.6 0.4 0.4 1.7 1.5