Table 2 Quality Checklist
From: Software architectures for big data: a systematic literature review
No | Question |
|---|---|
Q1 | Are the aims of the study is clearly stated? |
Q2 | Are the scope and context of the study clearly defined? |
Q3 | Is the proposed solution clearly explained and validated by an empirical study? |
Q4 | Are the variables used in the study likely to be valid and reliable? |
Q5 | Is the research process documented adequately? |
Q6 | Are the all study questions answered? |
Q7 | Are the negative findings presented? |
Q8 | Are the main findings stated clearly in terms of creditability, validity and reliability? |
Q9 | Do the conclusions relate to the aim of the purpose of study? |
Q10 | Does the report have implications in practice and results in research area for big data software architecture? |